The best CEOs learn how to make themselves less important
After building six entrepreneurial ventures and leading teams through growth, uncertainty, technological change, and difficult transitions, I have learned that leadership is not primarily about me, the CEO having the answers. It is about creating an organisation in which other people can make strong decisions without waiting for the leader to enter the room.
One of the biggest mistakes a founder can make is to be ever-present.
What I have learnt across my six ventures is simple: you have to trust people with outcomes, not merely with tasks. Failure to delegate decision making beyond literal tasks can be the beginning of the end.
A task tells someone what to do. An outcome explains what needs to become different and gives them the space to determine how to achieve it. Instead of asking a team to launch several features, for example, a leader might ask them to increase the number of high-intent customers who successfully complete a transaction. The team can then decide whether the answer is a new feature, clearer communication, a simpler process, or the removal of unnecessary friction.
Empowerment, however, must begin with clarity. People need to understand the outcome they own, why it matters, how it connects to the company’s strategy, and where the boundaries of their authority lie. Responsibility without decision-making authority is not empowerment. It is frustration.
As companies grow, leaders must also turn important decisions into repeatable systems. A company should not depend on its CEO having a brilliant day. Product, commercial, hiring, and risk decisions should be guided by frameworks that make assumptions visible and allow others to apply and improve the reasoning whether the CEO is in the room or not.
I have also learned to ask questions before providing answers. Giving the solution may be faster in the moment, but asking questions such as “What evidence would change our mind?” or “What is the real constraint?” helps people become stronger independent thinkers. The objective is not to make the team dependent on the leader’s judgment, but to improve the quality of judgment and ownership throughout the organisation.
Trust becomes particularly important during uncertainty. When markets change or setbacks occur, leaders should provide context, priorities, and agency. They should explain what has changed, reduce the number of objectives, and give the people closest to the problem room to solve it. Calm does not mean pretending everything is fine. It means acknowledging difficulty without transferring the leader’s anxiety to the team.
High-performing teams also need both psychological safety and accountability. People should feel able to challenge assumptions, admit mistakes, and raise concerns early. At the same time, commitments and standards must remain meaningful. Honest feedback is not the opposite of trust. It is one of its clearest expressions.
Ultimately, the strongest sign that a team is scaling is that the leader becomes less involved in routine decisions while the quality of execution continues to improve.
Leadership is not about proving that the company still needs you everywhere. It is about building a company that can think, decide, and perform beyond the limits of any individual.
My personal philosophy is therefore to provide clarity, place decisions close to the people with the best information, create repeatable decision systems, encourage disagreement before decisions, and expect commitment afterwards.
Leadership should not be measured by how many decisions pass through you. It should be measured by how many decisions can be made without you.
For more startup news, check out the other articles on the website, and subscribe to the magazine for free. Listen to The Cereal Entrepreneur podcast for more interviews with entrepreneurs and big-hitters in the startup ecosystem.
