![Fundamental issues like a shortage of high-quality data threaten the AI boom](/sites/default/files/2024-07/Fundamental%20issues%20like%20a%20shortage%20of%20high-quality%20data%20threaten%20the%20AI%20boom.png)
Fundamental issues like a shortage of high-quality data threaten the AI boom
The ODI’s latest white paper, "Building a Better Future with Data and AI," based on research conducted in early 2024, highlights critical flaws in the UK's tech infrastructure that could hinder the expected benefits of the AI boom for society, the economy, and individuals. The paper also provides recommendations for fostering diverse and equitable data-centric AI.
From its findings, the ODI urges the new government to take five key actions to harness AI's opportunities while mitigating potential risks:
- Ensure widespread access to high-quality, well-governed public and private sector data to encourage a diverse, competitive AI market
- Enforce data protection and labour rights within the data supply chain
- Empower individuals to have greater control over the sharing and use of data for AI
- Update the intellectual property regime to ensure AI models are developed with a focus on trust and stakeholder empowerment
- Increase transparency regarding the data used to train high-risk AI models
The white paper asserts that emerging AI technologies hold significant promise for transforming sectors like diagnostics and personalised education. However, it also points out the substantial challenges and risks tied to widespread adoption. Specifically, generative AI's reliance on a limited number of machine learning datasets, which lack robust governance frameworks, presents major risks. Poor data governance can lead to biases and unethical practices, undermining AI applications' trust and reliability in crucial areas such as healthcare, finance, and public services.
These risks are further compounded by a lack of transparency, which hinders efforts to address biases, eliminate harmful content, and ensure legal compliance. To better understand how data transparency varies across different system providers, the ODI is developing a new "AI Data Transparency Index."
Sir Nigel Shadbolt, Executive Chair & Co-founder of the ODI, said, “If the UK is to benefit from the extraordinary opportunities presented by AI, the government must look beyond the hype and attend to the fundamentals of a robust data ecosystem built on sound governance and ethical foundations. We must build a trustworthy data infrastructure for AI because the feedstock of high-quality AI is high-quality data. The UK has the opportunity to build better data governance systems for AI that ensure we are best placed to take advantage of technological innovations and create economic and social value whilst guarding against potential risks.”
Before the General Election, Labour’s Manifesto outlined plans for a National Data Library to bring together existing research programmes and help deliver data-enabled public services. However, the ODI says that first, we need to ensure the data is AI-ready. As well as being accessible and trustworthy, data must meet agreed standards, which require a data assurance and quality assessment infrastructure. The ODI’s recent research has found that currently - with a few exceptions – AI training datasets typically lack robust governance measures throughout the AI life cycle, posing safety, security, trust, and ethical challenges related to data protection and fair labour practices. Issues that needs to be addressed if the government is to make good on its plans.
Other insights from the ODI’s research include:
- The public needs safeguarding against the risk of personal data being used illegally to train AI models. Steps must be taken to address the ongoing risks of generative AI models inadvertently leaking personal data through clever prompting by users. Solid and other privacy-enhancing technologies have great potential to help protect people’s rights and privacy as AIs become more prevalent
- Key transparency information about data sources, copyright, and inclusion of personal information and more is rarely included by systems flagged within the Partnership for AI’s AI Incidents Database.
- Intellectual property law must be urgently updated to protect the UK’s creative industries from unethical AI model training practices.
- Legislation safeguarding labour rights will be vital to the UK's AI Safety agenda.
- The rising price of high-quality AI training data excludes potential innovators like small businesses and academia.