Dragons’ Den or Dinosaur’s Den?: why it’s losing relevance
Just like many entrepreneurs, I have been approached by the Dragons’ Den multiple times to pitch my business on the show, and every time we were called, I declined. For years, the show was the ultimate launchpad for startups, promising funding, exposure, and prestige. But let’s be honest: Is Dragons’ Den still the powerhouse it once was, or has it become nothing more than a flashy TV relic, out of touch with the realities of modern entrepreneurship?
Why I declined Dragons’ Den
At first glance, Dragons’ Den seems like a dream opportunity – pitch your startup, secure funding from high-profile investors, and gain nationwide TV exposure. So, why did I say no?
For one, the show prioritises entertainment over genuine entrepreneurial support. The dramatic negotiations, high-pressure environment, and public scrutiny might make for great television, but they don’t reflect how real-world investment works. The reality is, Dragons’ Den is more about crafting compelling TV moments than fostering meaningful business relationships that drive long-term success.
Furthermore, the investment terms offered on the show were unjustifiable. Many deals involve giving up large equity stakes for small capital amounts, something that most of the modern founders are increasingly wary of. Startups nowadays have way more options, and taking a deal in a 10-minute pitch simply doesn’t align with strategic, well-laid out funding decisions.
The changing startup funding landscape
Initially, when Dragons’ Den was first aired, it was indeed one of the very few mainstream ways for the startups to gain exposure to angels, secure funding, and get their business going, but now, the funding landscape has evolved drastically.
Crowdfunding platforms such as Kickstarter and Indiegogo allow newly started startups to validate and demand while raising good capital without sacrificing their equity. Angel investor networks and syndicates provide materials and access to strategic investors who not only offer money but also offer the most valuable business insights, venture capital firms continue to be a go-to place for high-growth startups looking for a long-term backing. Even the ones who are truly based on the revenue, they offer an alternative to traditional equity deals. Simply put, the all under one roof model of Dragons’ Den is no longer serving what it was made for.
Today's CEOs are more likely to be inclined towards investors who provide much more strategic value, helping with product development, networking, and upscaling.
Is Dragon’s Den still helping entrepreneurs?
To a certain extent, there’s no denying that some businesses benefit from the show’s massive exposure though that is often fleeting and short-lived. However, the actual impact of Dragons’ Den is far more questionable. Many agreements made on camera fall apart once the filming stops, with investors withdrawing from negotiations entirely. The deals that do go through are often more about boosting the show's entertainment value than supporting innovative entrepreneurs. For founders seeking genuine partnerships and sustainable growth, Dragons’ Den may no longer be the golden ticket it once appeared to be.
The shift in entrepreneurial priorities
Founders these days are more protective of their equity and cautious about quick and highly pressurised deals done under the table. But, the traditional Dragons’ Den format was supposed to be a bit different, where entrepreneurs have five minutes to pitch their business and make decisions that could change their life, but unfortunately, that doesn’t reflect how real funding works.
Raising capital is all about implementing a strategic process that involves due diligence, the notion that a founder should agree or reject an offer under the brighten up studio is outdated, a format which is no longer followed.
The future of Dragon’s Den and startup TV shows
If Dragons’ Den wants to stay authentic, it needs to understand that with time, it needs to evolve. Incorporating crowdfunding components, allowing real-time active audience participation, or focusing more on the mentorship-driven series could be the most authentic ways to modernise this format. A massive shift towards a more-digitised approach, where the founders can have a one-on-one talk with the potential investors, just beyond five minutes in a studio, might also help retain the authenticity of the show from drifting it towards more irrelevance. However, if it remains stuck in its traditional format, it risks becoming little more than a nostalgia piece rather than a meaningful startup funding avenue.
For more startup news, check out the other articles on the website, and subscribe to the magazine for free. Listen to The Cereal Entrepreneur podcast for more interviews with entrepreneurs and big-hitters in the startup ecosystem.
