Time after time, studies have shown that workplace diversity promotes success, increasing revenue, cultivating new ways of thinking, and bringing organisations to the next level. However, with political policy changes, Diversity, Equality and Inclusion (DEI) faces an uncertain future. As many major companies, including Amazon, Bank of America, Warner Bros., and Paramount, scale back DEI initiatives, HR leaders are raising the alarm – and some say they’re right to do so. 

No one disputes the need for the right people with the right skills in the right roles, or that appointments should be based on merit and fit, ensuring the best person gets the job. However, it's important to recognise that a broader and more diverse recruitment pool gives employers greater choice in finding the perfect fit for the role and for their organisation. The debate may lie more in the term “DEI” itself rather than in the core value of fostering a diverse and inclusive workforce. It’s crucial to separate concerns over terminology from the underlying principle – ensuring we don’t lose sight of its true purpose in the process.

Few would argue against the importance of hiring the right people with the right skills for the right roles, ensuring appointments are based on merit and fit. However, expanding the recruitment pool to be more diverse not only upholds these principles but also gives employers a wider talent base to find the best match for both the role and the organisation. The debate may lie more in the term “DEI” itself rather than in the core value of fostering a diverse and inclusive workforce. It’s crucial to separate concerns over terminology from the underlying principle – ensuring we don’t lose sight of its true purpose in the process.

Rolling back DEI is not a simple policy update, especially not for ambitious SMEs seeking to expand globally. For companies like this, deprioritising DEI not only poses a reputational risk, but also threatens to derail global growth by limiting market opportunities and in some cases creating costly compliance challenges. 

Reputational risks 

Failing to centre on the principles of DEI can have a serious impact on your organisation’s reputation. SHRM notes that prospective employees are generally more attracted to companies that promote ethical practices. They also demonstrate an increased likelihood of remaining with companies wherein they feel seen, valued, and respected. 

Companies hastily scaling back DEI initiatives in response to shifting government policies risk damaging their reputation, particularly among younger employees – who, after all, represent the future workforce. At the time of writing, DEI laws in the USA have not actually changed, and so the corporate response of scaling back DEI is preventative rather than mandated. A quick reversal of these policies can be off-putting to top talent, as it appears that instead of truly valuing diversity and inclusion, these companies were merely engaging in box-ticking exercises. This can leave workers feeling abandoned, let down, and devalued. With this drop in employee morale, companies can expect to see a rapid decrease in retention, as workers seek opportunities with employers that continue to uphold the values they align with. As a result, it may become more difficult to fill these vacated positions, as the companies’ reputations as inclusive, respectful employers will be tarnished. It is also important to understand local cultures and values and the context in which DEI activities should be applied.  

When moving into new markets, a strong reputation is key to recruiting top talent and building a fortified global workforce. If your company has garnered poor online reviews from previous workers, or your decision to scale back DEI activities has made the news, this may negatively impact your reputation at market-level, limiting your overseas success from the get-go. 

Compliance challenges 

While DEI may be under scrutiny in the US, it has solid standing elsewhere and failing to adhere to local employment legislation when expanding globally can cause serious issues for companies of all sizes, not least SMEs. 

In Italy, for example, disability employment laws mandate employers with over 50 staff to meet a 7% disability quota, while in France, employers with 20 or more employees must ensure 6% of their workforce is disabled, or else they must make a payment to the state. 

As a US or UK organisation, rolling back DEI initiatives while operating in such markets could lead to significant consequences. Companies that engage in noncompliance internationally by attempting to apply the laws of their home country to their global enterprises, or simply failing to get properly acquainted with the regulations in their new countries of operation risk incurring hefty fines, operational restrictions, legal proceedings, and reputational harm. 

Compliance is a complex space, and is often nuanced, so when moving into new territories, it’s crucial to ensure that your business is armed with up-to-date local knowledge and insights. Using a global hiring service provider can alleviate the administrative burden and mitigate the risk of accidental non-compliance, as their experts will make it their business to stay abreast of every change, big or small, to local legislation in your areas of operation. 

Limited talent pool and loss of innovation 

Studies show that without DEI policies, unconscious bias often limits the pools of people from which companies select their talent. We need to be aware of the Halo effect in recruitment and also of unconscious bias. Underrepresented groups – including ethnic minorities, individuals from working-class backgrounds, women, neurodiverse individuals, members of the LGBTQIA+ community, and those with disabilities – are often overlooked for roles. Addressing disparities such as the gender pay gap and race pay gap requires proactive measures to drive meaningful change.

Failing to implement and sustain equity initiatives in your global business not only risks non-compliance and damaging your company’s reputation, but may also result in a lack of diversity, a decline in overall employee morale, and slower progress, ultimately hindering your success on the international stage. You should also recognise that a minority in one part of the world may not be a minority in another.

When a workforce is primarily composed of people of a similar profile, this will slow innovation, impacting the creative environment fostered by diverse workplaces, and the company’s ability to appeal to different markets and adapt to cultural preferences in new markets. 

In sectors such as tech, which are already struggling with talent shortages and skills gaps, shifting focus away from diversity and inclusion efforts further limits access to diverse talent pools, weakening global competitiveness. High-growth startups must recognise that maintaining DEI initiatives and complying with local laws is not just ethical but adds real value and is essential for ensuring legal, financial, and regulatory excellence and securing a successful global future.

For more startup news, check out the other articles on the website, and subscribe to the magazine for free. Listen to The Cereal Entrepreneur podcast for more interviews with entrepreneurs and big-hitters in the startup ecosystem.